<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: AMD A10 7870K CPU Review &#8211; Welcoming Competition!	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-a10-7870k-cpu-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-a10-7870k-cpu-review/</link>
	<description>Tomorrow&#039;s Technology Today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 02:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: onstrike112		</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-a10-7870k-cpu-review/#comment-3295</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[onstrike112]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=29505#comment-3295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good review. I&#039;m looking to use one for an HTPC, and it seems from what I&#039;ve read, it fits the bill, even with the integrated GPU. I&#039;d be interested to see how well it works in an ITX build, so I guess I&#039;ll just have to see for myself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review. I&#8217;m looking to use one for an HTPC, and it seems from what I&#8217;ve read, it fits the bill, even with the integrated GPU. I&#8217;d be interested to see how well it works in an ITX build, so I guess I&#8217;ll just have to see for myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alex Stevens		</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-a10-7870k-cpu-review/#comment-2952</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Stevens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2015 02:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=29505#comment-2952</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-a10-7870k-cpu-review/#comment-2939&quot;&gt;MegamaN&lt;/a&gt;.

Your 6300 is absolutely fine. If you wanted an upgrade I&#039;d recommend waiting for Zen. This CPU although absolutely wonderful, in someways gets beaten by the FX 6300 especially when something supports more cores or uses L3 Cache. 


Putting it up against an i7 is simply unfair.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-a10-7870k-cpu-review/#comment-2939">MegamaN</a>.</p>
<p>Your 6300 is absolutely fine. If you wanted an upgrade I&#8217;d recommend waiting for Zen. This CPU although absolutely wonderful, in someways gets beaten by the FX 6300 especially when something supports more cores or uses L3 Cache. </p>
<p>Putting it up against an i7 is simply unfair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MegamaN		</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-a10-7870k-cpu-review/#comment-2948</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MegamaN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=29505#comment-2948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-a10-7870k-cpu-review/#comment-2947&quot;&gt;Ramon Grigio&lt;/a&gt;.

I was waiting for Zen anyways.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-a10-7870k-cpu-review/#comment-2947">Ramon Grigio</a>.</p>
<p>I was waiting for Zen anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ramon Grigio		</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-a10-7870k-cpu-review/#comment-2947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramon Grigio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=29505#comment-2947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-a10-7870k-cpu-review/#comment-2939&quot;&gt;MegamaN&lt;/a&gt;.

I don&#039;t think so. And You would need a new motherboard. While it&#039;s a really nice chip i belive you should look for a FX-8370/8370E (125W/95W) if you need more power.If your software does not use more than 4 threads it might not be even worth it. Save money for a i5 (the cheapest ones starts at +- $180,00) or AMD Zen...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-a10-7870k-cpu-review/#comment-2939">MegamaN</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so. And You would need a new motherboard. While it&#8217;s a really nice chip i belive you should look for a FX-8370/8370E (125W/95W) if you need more power.If your software does not use more than 4 threads it might not be even worth it. Save money for a i5 (the cheapest ones starts at +- $180,00) or AMD Zen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MegamaN		</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-a10-7870k-cpu-review/#comment-2939</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MegamaN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=29505#comment-2939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow! This review pretty fair. Most of the time we see monster i7s making this CPU look like a chump, but it&#039;s really a champ. Thank you for the review.
Would it be considered an upgrade, from the CPU-side of things, to my FX-6300?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! This review pretty fair. Most of the time we see monster i7s making this CPU look like a chump, but it&#8217;s really a champ. Thank you for the review.<br />
Would it be considered an upgrade, from the CPU-side of things, to my FX-6300?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
