<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: XFX Double Dissipation R9 290 (4GB) Review &#8211; Rock Solid Value!	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/xfx-double-dissipation-r9-290-4gb-review-rock-solid-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/xfx-double-dissipation-r9-290-4gb-review-rock-solid-value/</link>
	<description>Tomorrow&#039;s Technology Today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alex Stevens		</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/xfx-double-dissipation-r9-290-4gb-review-rock-solid-value/#comment-2264</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Stevens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=24923#comment-2264</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technologyx.com/featured/xfx-double-dissipation-r9-290-4gb-review-rock-solid-value/#comment-2261&quot;&gt;Casecutter&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks a lot, we do see the 970 does quite well against our 290, but as I said in the article a decent 290 can be had for around $270 and does 1440P very well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/xfx-double-dissipation-r9-290-4gb-review-rock-solid-value/#comment-2261">Casecutter</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot, we do see the 970 does quite well against our 290, but as I said in the article a decent 290 can be had for around $270 and does 1440P very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Casecutter		</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/xfx-double-dissipation-r9-290-4gb-review-rock-solid-value/#comment-2261</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Casecutter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=24923#comment-2261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice &quot;mano-a-mano&quot; review; and comes out how the 290 is overall &quot;value leader&quot; for entry into 1440p gaming!  Many recognized this after the 970 came out... it didn’t much push healthier 1440p over 780.  Two friends at time made the move buying just as the R9 290 price dropped, while they then used the approximately $100 they didn&#039;t ante-up to 970 to offset the cost upgrading to a new 1440p panels.  While the interesting thing on power...  if you &quot;sleep&quot; your computer AMD ZeroCore can make back a good portion of the energy maxwell saves during gaming (unless you&#039;re like &#062;25 hours a week) in a months time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice &#8220;mano-a-mano&#8221; review; and comes out how the 290 is overall &#8220;value leader&#8221; for entry into 1440p gaming!  Many recognized this after the 970 came out&#8230; it didn’t much push healthier 1440p over 780.  Two friends at time made the move buying just as the R9 290 price dropped, while they then used the approximately $100 they didn&#8217;t ante-up to 970 to offset the cost upgrading to a new 1440p panels.  While the interesting thing on power&#8230;  if you &#8220;sleep&#8221; your computer AMD ZeroCore can make back a good portion of the energy maxwell saves during gaming (unless you&#8217;re like &gt;25 hours a week) in a months time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
