<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>| Technology X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technologyx.com/tag/haswell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.technologyx.com/tag/haswell/</link>
	<description>Tomorrow&#039;s Technology Today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2016 16:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>AMD vs Intel &#8211; Our 8-Core CPU Gaming Performance Showdown!</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-vs-intel-our-8-core-cpu-gaming-performance-showdown/</link>
					<comments>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-vs-intel-our-8-core-cpu-gaming-performance-showdown/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donny Stanley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5960x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd vs intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best cpu for gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fx-8370]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skylake]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=28956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As a gamer and hardware enthusiast that spends a lot of time in various PC gaming communities, one of the longest on-going debates has been the best choice for CPU when it comes to gaming; Intel or AMD. While there are users on both sides claiming their favorite brand is the best, we&#8217;ve noticed quite &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-vs-intel-our-8-core-cpu-gaming-performance-showdown/">AMD vs Intel &#8211; Our 8-Core CPU Gaming Performance Showdown!</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.technologyx.com">Technology X</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-vs-intel-our-8-core-cpu-gaming-performance-showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>426</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSI H97I AC Motherboard Review &#8211; Big Features at Reasonable Cost!</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/msi-h97i-ac-review/</link>
					<comments>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/msi-h97i-ac-review/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Stevens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devils Canyon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H97]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H97. Overclock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini itx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini-itx with wireless ac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherboards with wireless ac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSI H97I AC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overclocking with H97 Motherboards]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=22368</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>So, if you read our Pentium G3258 review a while ago here you might have noticed us alluding to the motherboard in that build, and today we will be doing a review on the MSI H97I AC  mini-ITX motherboard that is feature packed and budget friendly. Coming in at around $110 this board features enough to make &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/msi-h97i-ac-review/">MSI H97I AC Motherboard Review &#8211; Big Features at Reasonable Cost!</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.technologyx.com">Technology X</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/msi-h97i-ac-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thermaltake Toughpower 1500W Gold PSU Unboxing &#038; Overview</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/thermaltake-toughpower-1500w-gold-psu-unboxing-overview/</link>
					<comments>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/thermaltake-toughpower-1500w-gold-psu-unboxing-overview/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Webster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 14:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1500w gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pci-e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Supply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermaltake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toughpower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPD-1500M]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=24746</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thermaltake has been making power supplies for quite some time. They have models for all segments of the market, from entry level to PSUs that meet even the most extreme enthusiast’s demands. In fact, we’d venture to say, if you’ve been building systems for a while, odds are you’ve used a Thermaltake PSU at one &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/thermaltake-toughpower-1500w-gold-psu-unboxing-overview/">Thermaltake Toughpower 1500W Gold PSU Unboxing &#038; Overview</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.technologyx.com">Technology X</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/thermaltake-toughpower-1500w-gold-psu-unboxing-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>4K Gaming PC Under $1500 (USD) &#8211; Our Build Of The Week</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/4k-gaming-pc-1500-build-of-the-week/</link>
					<comments>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/4k-gaming-pc-1500-build-of-the-week/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donny Stanley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 13:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chassis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1000w]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4690k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4k gaming pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[build of the week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core i5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corsair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crossfirex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enthoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming pc under 1500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc gaming build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phanteks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[r9 290]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seagate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uhd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vengeance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=22379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>With the recent arrival of relatively inexpensive, high quality 4K ultra high-definition displays, 4K gaming is becoming more common and a lot easier to get into. The only problem is, many users don&#8217;t know exactly what kind of hardware they&#8217;d need in order to push their games at 4K. What&#8217;s worst is that many also &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/4k-gaming-pc-1500-build-of-the-week/">4K Gaming PC Under $1500 (USD) &#8211; Our Build Of The Week</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.technologyx.com">Technology X</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/4k-gaming-pc-1500-build-of-the-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>2013 MacBook Air Ultrabook Review (13&#8243;) &#8211; Amazing Performance and Battery Life</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/systems/ultrabook-systems/2013-macbook-air-review-amazing-performance-and-battery-life/</link>
					<comments>http://www.technologyx.com/systems/ultrabook-systems/2013-macbook-air-review-amazing-performance-and-battery-life/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les Tokar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ultrabook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 MacBook Air Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benched]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chipset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disk Speed Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD 5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NovaBench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCIe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QuickBench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAMSUNG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://technologyx.com/?p=10981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>So Apple released their 2013 MacBook Air just over a week ago and, on the exterior, not a thing has changed.  Why should it?  It is no secret that one of the longest standing rivalries between Apple and Samsung is alive and well and, coincidentally, the two most attractive ultrabook designs are easily the MacBook &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/systems/ultrabook-systems/2013-macbook-air-review-amazing-performance-and-battery-life/">2013 MacBook Air Ultrabook Review (13&#8243;) &#8211; Amazing Performance and Battery Life</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.technologyx.com">Technology X</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyx.com/systems/ultrabook-systems/2013-macbook-air-review-amazing-performance-and-battery-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
