<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>| Technology X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technologyx.com/tag/xfx-double-dissipation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.technologyx.com/tag/xfx-double-dissipation/</link>
	<description>Tomorrow&#039;s Technology Today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>XFX Double Dissipation R9 290 (4GB) Review &#8211; Rock Solid Value!</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/xfx-double-dissipation-r9-290-4gb-review-rock-solid-value/</link>
					<comments>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/xfx-double-dissipation-r9-290-4gb-review-rock-solid-value/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Stevens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[290 vs 970]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4GB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[512 bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD r9 290]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDDR5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPU under $300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gtx 970]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTX 970 Strix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTX 970 VS R9 290]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VRAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XFX double Dissipation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XFX Graphics Card Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=24923</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The AMD R9 290 is a GPU based upon on AMD&#8217;s older flagship Hawaii GPU core as seen in the 290X. It is priced below the GTX 970 from Nvidia, and offers comparable performance in most cases. This is why we&#8217;re revisiting one of the top performers today. While AMD&#8217;s next generation of cards may be around &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/xfx-double-dissipation-r9-290-4gb-review-rock-solid-value/">XFX Double Dissipation R9 290 (4GB) Review &#8211; Rock Solid Value!</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.technologyx.com">Technology X</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/xfx-double-dissipation-r9-290-4gb-review-rock-solid-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
