<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>| Technology X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technologyx.com/tag/skylake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.technologyx.com/tag/skylake/</link>
	<description>Tomorrow&#039;s Technology Today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2016 16:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>XMP Profiles &#038; Skylake Stability Issues &#8211; CES 2016 Update</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/pc-hardware/xmp-profiles-skylake-stability-issues-ces-2016-update/</link>
					<comments>http://www.technologyx.com/pc-hardware/xmp-profiles-skylake-stability-issues-ces-2016-update/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jolliffe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 01:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CES 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skylake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stability Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unstable Z170]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Z170]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=31756</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As CES continues one of the topics that we frequently discussed with memory and motherboard manufacturers is the on-going issue of unstable Skylake builds. This topic seems to be rather &#8216;hush-hush&#8217; throughout the industry, and if not &#8216;hush-hush&#8217; than it is a topic not readily discussed.  As seen in our latest Z170 build, we found &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/pc-hardware/xmp-profiles-skylake-stability-issues-ces-2016-update/">XMP Profiles &#038; Skylake Stability Issues &#8211; CES 2016 Update</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.technologyx.com">Technology X</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyx.com/pc-hardware/xmp-profiles-skylake-stability-issues-ces-2016-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD vs Intel &#8211; Our 8-Core CPU Gaming Performance Showdown!</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-vs-intel-our-8-core-cpu-gaming-performance-showdown/</link>
					<comments>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-vs-intel-our-8-core-cpu-gaming-performance-showdown/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donny Stanley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5960x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd vs intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best cpu for gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fx-8370]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skylake]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=28956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As a gamer and hardware enthusiast that spends a lot of time in various PC gaming communities, one of the longest on-going debates has been the best choice for CPU when it comes to gaming; Intel or AMD. While there are users on both sides claiming their favorite brand is the best, we&#8217;ve noticed quite &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-vs-intel-our-8-core-cpu-gaming-performance-showdown/">AMD vs Intel &#8211; Our 8-Core CPU Gaming Performance Showdown!</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.technologyx.com">Technology X</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/amd-vs-intel-our-8-core-cpu-gaming-performance-showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>426</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel&#8217;s Tick-Tock Production Cycle Slows Down</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/intels-tick-tock-production-cycle-slows/</link>
					<comments>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/intels-tick-tock-production-cycle-slows/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Gale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cannonlake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel's Tick-Tock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skylake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tick-Tock]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=28905</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Most PC enthusiasts have heard about Intel&#8217;s Tick-Tock production cycle. Simply put, each Tock introduces a new micro-architecture while the Tick then miniaturizes to a small fabrication process. This meant the new CPU series was introduced once a year where one year a Tock is introduced and the following a Tick is then introduced in &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/intels-tick-tock-production-cycle-slows/">Intel&#8217;s Tick-Tock Production Cycle Slows Down</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.technologyx.com">Technology X</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/intels-tick-tock-production-cycle-slows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Rumored to Switch Back to FIVR in 2017</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/intel-rumored-switch-back-fivr-2017/</link>
					<comments>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/intel-rumored-switch-back-fivr-2017/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Gale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIVR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaby Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skylake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voltage regulator]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=28789</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Haswell platform was where Intel introduced FIVR or the fully integrated voltage regulator unit. This placed some of the VR (Voltage Regulation) on the die allowing for motherboards to have less power phases on board. For the upcoming Skylake and including next years Kaby Lake, Intel has decided to go back to the traditional &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/featured/intel-rumored-switch-back-fivr-2017/">Intel Rumored to Switch Back to FIVR in 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.technologyx.com">Technology X</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyx.com/featured/intel-rumored-switch-back-fivr-2017/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel’s Kaby Lake to Succeed Skylake in 2016</title>
		<link>http://www.technologyx.com/news/intels-kaby-lake-succeed-skylake-2016/</link>
					<comments>http://www.technologyx.com/news/intels-kaby-lake-succeed-skylake-2016/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Gale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cannonlake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaby Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skylake]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technologyx.com/?p=28260</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Intel has once again changed its roadmap and will introduce what we believe to be a Skylake refresh CPU code-named Kaby Lake. Kaby Lake will be compatible with the upcoming 100 series LGA1151 motherboards just like Devils Canyon was too Haswell. Kaby Lake processors made using 14nm FinFET process technology and will feature two or &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.technologyx.com/news/intels-kaby-lake-succeed-skylake-2016/">Intel’s Kaby Lake to Succeed Skylake in 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.technologyx.com">Technology X</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyx.com/news/intels-kaby-lake-succeed-skylake-2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
